"I feel really special and proud that I am bilingual”: Exploring a second-generation Korean American bilingual adolescent's emotions and sense of belonging through family language policy

Aims and objectives: The purpose of this exploratory case study is to contribute to the set of studies that center children's perspectives on their bilingual development, with a specific focus on their emotional connection within their linguistic family landscape. Methodology: This was a case study of a Korean transnational family in the United States and included both parents and their daughter. Data and analysis: Due to COVID-19 restrictions, semi-structured in-depth interviews and a language-mapping activity were conducted via ZOOM, recorded, and transcribed. DeDoose, a qualitative collaborative research tool, was used to conduct a thematic analysis. Findings and conclusion: Findings suggest that parents positioning bilingualism as a resource for communication and expression impacts a bilingual child's positive linguistic and socioemotional well-being. A strong sense of belonging was shaped through strong relationships with parents and family, engagement in diverse and inclusive spaces that valued multilingualism and multiculturalism, and by being given agency in one's own language choices. Originality: This study focuses on a Korean immigrant family and centers on the child's experiences. It provides a counter-narrative to the negative emotions parents and their children often express in extant family language policy (FLP) research. The study calls for FLP research to include a "multilingualism as a resource” orientation. Significance/implications: This case study provides the lens of multilingualism as a resource through FLP that has a different impact on the emotional dimensions of heritage language learning and maintenance. © The Author(s) 2023.

Haemostatic differences between SARS-CoV- 2 PCR-positive and -negative patients at the time of hospital admission

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV- 2) is associated with a prothrombotic phenotype with an increased risk for thrombosis. Aim(s): To investigate whether COVID-19 is associated with changes in coagulation parameters upon presentation at the emergency department and whether these changes are associated with the development of thrombotic complications in patients with SARS-CoV- 2 infection. Method(s): A single centre, cross-sectional cohort study: The MArkers in COVID-19 And Relations to Outcomes in the Netherlands (MACARON) study was conducted. All patients suspected of SARS-CoV- 2 infection referred to the emergency department of the Meander Medical Center between March-May 2020 were included. 519 patients (26% PCR positive, median age 66 (range 19-97 years), 52.2% male) were included from whom an oro-and nasopharyngeal swab was obtained for detection of SARS-CoV- 2 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Blood samples for laboratory analysis were obtained from all patients. Thrombosis was defined as a clinical diagnosis of venous thromboembolism or atherothrombotic event based upon radiology and laboratory results. Result(s): SARS-CoV- 2 PCR positive patients had increased fibrinogen levels (5.41 g/L vs. 4.21 g/L, p < 0.001) and decreased levels of protein C (85.1% vs. 96.1%, p < 0.001) and alpha2-macroglobulin (4.41 muM vs. 5.11 muM, p < 0.001) compared to the PCR negative patients. In addition, we found more acquired activated protein C resistance in PCR positive patients. Furthermore, we found that elevated levels of factor VIII (208% vs. 162%, p = 0.028) and von Willebrand Factor (208% vs. 186%, p = 0.038) and decreased ADAMTS-13 levels (597 ng/ml vs. 691 ng/ml, p < 0.001) were associated with increased occurrence of thrombosis in PCR positive patients (thrombosis vs. non-thrombosis). Conclusion(s): We found that PCR positive patients had a more pronounced prothrombotic phenotype with endothelial activation upon hospital admission showing that coagulation tests may be considered useful to discriminate severe cases of COVID-19 at risk for thrombosis.

Haemostatic differences between SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and negative patients at the time of hospital admission.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with thrombosis. We conducted a cohort study of consecutive patients, suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection presented to the emergency department. We investigated haemostatic differences between SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive and negative patients, with dedicated coagulation analysis. The 519 included patients had a median age of 66 years, and 52.5% of the patients were male. Twenty-six percent of the patients were PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2.PCR positive patients had increased levels of fibrinogen and (active) von Willebrand Factor (VWF) and decreased levels of protein C and α2-macroglobulin compared to the PCR negative patients. In addition, we found acquired activated protein C resistance in PCR positive patients. Furthermore, we found that elevated levels of factor VIII and VWF and decreased levels of ADAMTS-13 were associated with an increased incidence of thrombosis in PCR positive patients. In conclusion, we found that PCR positive patients had a pronounced prothrombotic phenotype, mainly due to an increase of endothelial activation upon admission to the hospital. These findings show that coagulation tests may be considered useful to discriminate severe cases of COVID-19 at risk for thrombosis.

EuroGuiDerm Guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris - Part 2: specific clinical and comorbid situations.

This evidence- and consensus-based guideline on the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris was developed following the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. The second part of the guideline provides guidance for specific clinical and comorbid situations such as treating psoriasis vulgaris patient with concomitant psoriatic arthritis, concomitant inflammatory bowel disease, a history of malignancies or a history of depression or suicidal ideation. It further holds recommendations for concomitant diabetes, viral hepatitis, disease affecting the heart or the kidneys as well as concomitant neurological disease. Advice on how to screen for tuberculosis and recommendations on how to manage patients with a positive tuberculosis test result are given. It further covers treatment for pregnant women or patients with a wish for a child in the near future. Information on vaccination, immunogenicity and systemic treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic is also provided.

Low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in plasma of COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department.

Correct and reliable identification of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 suspected patients is essential for diagnosis. Respiratory samples should always be tested with real-time PCR for SARS-CoV-2. In addition, blood samples have been tested, but without consistent results and therefore the added value of this sample type is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time PCR in blood samples obtained from PCR-proven COVID-19 patients and in addition to elaborate on the potential use of blood for diagnostics. In this single center study, blood samples drawn from patients at the emergency department with proven COVID-19 infection based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR in respiratory samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Samples from 118 patients were selected, of which 102 could be included in the study (median age was 65 (IQR 10), 65.7 % men). In six (5.9 %) of the tested samples, SARS-CoV-2 was identified by real-time PCR. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 can be detected by real-time PCR in plasma samples from patients with proven COVID-19, but only in a minority of the patients. Plasma should therefore not be used as primary sample in an acute phase setting to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection. These findings are important to complete the knowledge on possible sample types to test to diagnose COVID-19.